How to choose your wine assortment by average check and restaurant type
There's no perfect wine list. There's the perfect list for your restaurant. Assortment should reflect who dines in your room, how much they spend and what they expect.
Contents
- 1.Why assortment depends on average check
- 2.4 restaurant profiles and their ideal assortment
- 3.Framework: from average check to price ladder
- 4.How many references per price tier
- 5.Common assortment composition mistakes
- 6.Assortment validation checklist
Why assortment depends on average check
The average check is the most reliable indicator of your guests' spending power and expectations.
Average check €25-35/person → best-seller between €8-16 (glass €4-6).
Average check €40-60/person → best-seller between €18-28 (glass €6-10).
Average check €70+/person → best-seller between €25-40 (glass €8-14).
If your best-seller isn't in that range, your assortment is misaligned with your audience.
4 restaurant profiles and their ideal assortment
Not all restaurants with the same average check need the same assortment.
Casual dining / gastrobar (check €20-35): 15-25 references, 60% reds, glass focus, max 2 price tiers, nothing above €35/bottle. Guests want simplicity.
Chef-driven restaurant (check €40-65): 30-50 references, white/red balance, 3 price tiers, premium glass as lever, small-producer wines for differentiation.
Fine dining (check €70+): 60-120+ references, depth by region/style, list as experience, minimum 4 price tiers, pairing suggestions, iconic wines as aspirational anchors.
Hotel / resort (variable check): dual list — simplified for casual outlet and in-depth for the gastronomic. Minibar and room service need separate curation.
Framework: from average check to price ladder
The price ladder is the distribution of your wines by retail-price tiers.
50-60% of your references should sit in the sweet-spot tier.
The entry tier exists so guests don't feel forced. Don't eliminate it.
Aspirational references don't need to sell much. Their job is to anchor the perceived value of your list.
Is your wine list performing as it should?
We'll analyse your list and show you concrete improvement opportunities in margin, rotation and average ticket.
How many references per price tier
More references doesn't mean a better list.
If you have more than 5 by-the-glass options, you're managing too much waste.
Every reference you add dilutes attention from the rest. More is not better.
Check: if any tier has over 40% of references with no sale in 30 days, you have too many.
Common assortment composition mistakes
Ego assortment: choosing wines the owner or sommelier likes instead of wines suited to the guest. Your list is not a personal collection.
Price gap: nothing between €18 and €35 when your sweet spot is right there. The guest goes for the cheapest option or skips wine entirely.
Redundancy: 4 Ribera del Duero Crianza in the same price range. They don't compete with competitors — they compete with each other.
No glass option: a restaurant with a €30 average check offering bottles only. The guest doesn't want to commit to €25 of wine.
Static list: the same assortment for 12 months. No seasonality, no novelty, no reason for guests to explore.
Assortment validation checklist
✓ Is your best-seller in the sweet-spot price tier (30-50% of average check)?
✓ Do you have at least 2 glass options in the entry tier?
✓ Does each price tier have enough options without redundancies?
✓ Have fewer than 20% of references gone unsold for 60+ days?
✓ Is there at least 1 white and 1 red per price tier?
✓ Are aspirational references recognizable to your audience?
✓ Can you explain in one sentence why each wine is on the list?
✓ Is the total number of references manageable for your team and storage?
Frequently asked questions
Next step
Winerim tells you exactly which wines your list needs
Assortment analysis, price ladder, gap and redundancy detection. All based on real data from your restaurant.
Diagnosis with real improvement opportunities. No cost.